Biography Breaking News Crime & Courts

Who is Faiz Siddiqui ( Unemployed Oxford law graduate SUES his parents ) Wiki, Bio, Age, Family, Incident details, Investigations and More Facts

Faiz Siddiqui

Faiz Siddiqui Biography                                                    Faiz Siddiqui Wiki

  • Faiz Siddiqui, 41, says he is totally dependent on her wealthy parents
  • Lawsuit against mother Rakshanda and father Javed for maintenance
  • In 2018 he tried to sue Oxford University for ‘poor’ education for £ 1million.

An unemployed Oxford graduate sues his parents, forcing them to grant him a lifetime scholarship.

Faiz Siddiqui, 41, says he is totally dependent on her wealthy parents who live in Dubai and has the right to be child support as a “vulnerable” adult child due to problems with health.

Siddiqui, who worked for several law firms after graduating, argues that refusing money would be a violation of his human rights.

The case comes just three years after Siddiqui, who tried to sue Oxford University for failing to obtain a first-class degree, received his £ 1million compensation from the High Court.

The Oxford graduate, unemployed since 2011, currently lives rentless in a £ 1million apartment owned by his mother, Rakshanda, 69, and father, Javed, 71, near Hyde Park, in central London.

Wealthy parents provided their son with over £ 400 a week and also helped him with the bills.

However, parents now want to reduce their means after an argument with their son, which they describe as “difficult, demanding and persistent”.

Siddiqui’s case has now been referred to the appeals court after a family judge fired him last year.

Family lawyer Justin Warshaw said ?

“These ailing parents have their own ideas of what is right for their ‘difficult, demanding and sensitive child’.

The only case came after Mr Siddiqui tried to sue his old university for a “woefully poor” education that cost him a high school diploma and a lucrative legal career.

The Oxford graduate had claimed classes were ‘boring’ and staff were on extended sabbaticals, which meant they only got a 2: 1 instead of the first degree they wanted.

He argued that it cost him a place in a law degree at one of America’s top Ivy League universities, like Yale or Harvard, and denied him the burgeoning legal career he had dreamed of.

Mr Siddiqui and his lawyer Roger Mallalieu had valued their loss of profit action against the registrar, masters and researchers of the University of Oxford at £ 1 million.

In 2018, however, Mr Siddiqui’s request was dismissed by the courts and a Supreme Court judge told him that the tuition fees he was collecting at Brasenose College were “perfectly reasonable”.

Judge Foskett ruled that Mr. Siddiqui’s “insufficient preparation” and “lack of academic discipline” to graduate were the reasons he had misbehaved in his June 2000 exams.

He added that even a “severe hay fever episode” may have contributed to Mr Siddiqui not getting the voice he wanted.

The judge also denied allegations that Mr Siddiqui’s personal guardian in Brasenose failed to inform investigating authorities that he was suffering from “insomnia, depression and anxiety” while writing the report. ‘a document.

Judge Foskett expressed “sympathy and understanding” for Siddiqui’s intermittent major depression and said there was no evidence that she suffered from mental health issues during her final exams.

Meanwhile, Oxford University admitted there were fewer teachers in the 1999 autumn semester, but denied teaching was “insufficient”.

After the landmark trial, Judge Foskett said: “While it cannot be said that certain aspects of a person’s education which are poorly taught can never prevent achieving a goal which would otherwise be the obstacles to reach.” The rationale for claiming damages for such improper delivery is broad and often overwhelming.

“In the present case, I was not convinced that the provision of a certain feature of the applicant’s diploma was inadequate or, in any event, had consequences.”

He added: “In other words, in the current climate, some 17 years after the major events in this case, when students take on substantial debt to continue their university studies, the quality of the education offered is certainly examined.” compared to the past.